Really Rough Draft.
Chad Anderson
English 102
Instructor Laura Cline
22 April 2012
The
Tale of Two Tales
Up in the Air, has
two different versions, the movie and the book.
Both are good tales in their own right, but they are fundamentally
different in the points they are trying to get across. They were written at different times in
different social and political climates.
Both works show those attitudes in their style of storytelling. The book written in 2001 is a third person
narrative of adventure in the life of a traveling businessman struggling with ambitions that never pan out,
relationship problems, and an obsession with getting one million sky miles;
while dealing with a life threating disease that he ignores. The movie filmed in 2009 is a romantic comedy
trying to place value on stability, commitment, and family life. They both have underlying subtext lined
throughout, but they don’t have the same agendas whatsoever. They do share one basic point, the main
character, Ryan Bingham, is a selfish, egocentric, yet well-spoken individual. The two stories were written differently,
because of economic downturns starting in 2005, the outlook on businessmen
based on those economic downturns, theatrical changes that emphasize a softer
main character and supporting characters, and a change in commitment views and
family life.
The
economy before 2001, the year the book was written, was going through a huge
boom in large part due to the starting businesses on the Internet. The U.S. and other countries were utilizing a
new tool that revolutionized the way companies did business. All you had to do to start a company was make
a web page and hope it did well. Business
was booming, jobs were plentiful and money was being spent. This all came to an end after the book was
written, the dot-com bubble burst which sent the economy into a downward spiral
that last to this day.
The
writing of the movie was severely affected by this downturn in the
economy. One instance is the difference
in that in the movie Ryan Bingham places his job in high regard. He wants to keep his job from being taken
over by the advancement of videoconferencing.
In the book Ryan doesn’t care about his job whatsoever. In fact he has a quit date that he hasn’t
even told his boss about. This is significant
because of the joblessness of the American people at the time the movie was
written. The writer, Jason Reitman, didn’t
want to portray someone that wasn’t grateful for having a job, because so many
people didn’t have one in the first place.
He also wanted to make Ryan look stronger in the eyes of the audience.
Businessmen
in 2009 weren’t highly regarded, because of the state of the economy. They had driven the U.S. into a hole too big
to fill, even though the government dumped huge sums of money in the form of
bailouts to the lending and financial institutions. Lots of innocent people lost their life
savings to faceless businessmen, investing their money unwisely. The movie’s goal was to portray a human side
to businessmen; even the ones that fired people for a living. This is where the character Natalie comes in
to play. She is the character that
questions the lifestyle that Ryan is living. She tries to implement the videoconferencing
style to CTC, the company where Ryan works.
Even though she is trying to streamline business, she is the character
that in the end shows the most humanity.
Ryan does his job with cold calculation, while Natalie doesn’t know what
she is getting in to. She finally quits
after a suicide, which derails the program she was trying to put in place. This shows the human aspect of the characters
that are working in a company that’s whole goal is to keep the job of firing
people faceless.
Family
values have always been a big issue, but they have a big influence in the
writing of the movie. In the book, Ryan
doesn’t want a family, and really doesn’t want to deal with the family he has. He is living a lifestyle in both the book and
movie that is lonely and isolated. It’s
only in the movie that he has some regrets towards the end for living that
lifestyle. In the book he has no
intention of having family or even a girlfriend. In the movie his isolation is encompassed by
the slogan for his lectures, “What’s in Your Backpack” (Reitman). His slogan sums up the fear of commitment and
settling down that he has. He is living
a live void of all possessions that most people hold high in value. He is lacking any real connections with
people in the world that most people live.
They strive for stable lives and personal relationships. This is something that Ryan doesn’t even
attempt to try. He is escaping from a
life that he is afraid to be involved with.
This point is what the movie tries to bring across. A good example is when he is outside the
restaurant talking to his sisters after the rehearsal dinner, he asks his
sister who is walking her down the aisle.
She says that her fiancé’s uncle is doing the honor. The reason he isn’t doing the honors, is
because he is never around. In the book
it is altogether different; Ryan is the one that saves Julie from running away
from her wedding. He is the one that
talks her into going back to her fiancé and going through with the
wedding. It is a reverse of the tale
between the movie and book.
While
the movie focuses on relations with other humans, the book is more of a rant
telling all of the selfish thoughts of Ryan Bingham. They are both works that are worth your
time. Although completely different they
are both trying to enlighten your sense of the business world. In the end, both works should be enjoyed separately
because they don’t have anything to do with each other. In this manner the reader or viewer truly enjoy
the product of the creators vision.
Awesome job so far! Your paper is clear and you back up your thesis with great arguments. One thing you might think of doing is trying to add a secondary source to back up your argument about the economy. That paragraph didn't have any quotes at all. Oh, and Ryan IS a CTC(Career Transition Counceler) and works for ISM(Integrated Strategic Management). You said he worked for CTC which is wrong
ReplyDeleteNice work, man. This paper is very well organized and well written. I could mirror Brent's comments, but it is a good paper.
ReplyDelete