Nabakov has some pretty simple definitions of what makes a good reader. In his essay "Good Readers and Good Writers," he outlines that one needs to have "imagination, a dictionary, memory, and some artistic sense." These are basic tenets, the bare minimum of being a good reader.
In my opinion a good reader has to be aware of the details. Details are what makes up the bedrock of a great story. To be able to recognize those minute details, is essential for a good reader. Any good reader will immerse themselves into the story making it real in their mind, letting it take them to where the author transports them.
Personally, I like to even imagine the smells that surround any particular scene. Play it out as if I'm standing there observing it. Mull over the colors, lighting, and scene layout of the particular setting.
I think all of us are aware of the show Reading Rainbow, if not, you have to check it out. It is a classic that will stand the test of time. The opening song is exactly what should happen to a good reader. Dragons should appear out of thin air, and butterflies swirl overhead; making your imagination purr.
I think I make up the part of the minority, that is a good reader. I try to immerse myself in any story I happen to get my hands on. Reading is a passion of mine, so it would be a waste of my time if I didn't want to go twice as high.
Hey Chad,
ReplyDeleteGreat post man! I couldn't agree more! Reading rainbow was an awesome show! When reading, you should get lost in the details of the words the author is describing. For me, if i am reading something I have no interest in, it is a lot harder to get lost in it. I have to have a connection to the material or for the most part, I find my mind wandering to other things. If an author can capture my interest, get me lost in the details, then he is truly a great writer. Perhaps a good reader would find a way to get lost in a book that is not particularly interesting. In that case, I am not a good reader. Thanks for the post man, I enjoyed it!